Should a Law Firm Bring SEO In-House or Hire an Agency?

A mature personal injury firm asked a good question on r/LawFirm: they have been paying SEO companies for a decade, they are jaded, and they want to learn enough to supervise their own person doing it in-house.

I run an agency, so take that into account. But my honest answer is that the question is about to be the wrong one, and here is why.

The Search You Are Hiring For Is About to Disappear

Google confirmed at their May I/O conference that the results page is changing. You are heading toward a world with roughly three recommendations per search, not ten blue links and not pages of results to scroll.

That matters more than it sounds, because the old SEO you have been buying for ten years was built for keywords. When someone typed "car accident lawyer Brooklyn," they got a result ranked on how well a firm played the keyword game. Whoever did the SEO best won the slot.

That game is ending. So if you bring it in-house now, you are hiring someone to get very good at a skill with a short shelf life.

What Replaces It Is Personal, Not Keyword-Based

Here is the part most firms have not absorbed yet. Every ChatGPT user has what is called persistent memory. The model knows things about that person from the day they signed up: where they live, what they drive, whether they tend to research everything or just want to be told what to do, what they have asked about before.

So when that person types "hey, I got rear-ended, do I even need a lawyer," ChatGPT is not running a keyword match. It is folding in everything it already knows about them and choosing a firm on criteria that have nothing to do with your meta tags. Ask it for a recommendation twice from two different accounts and you can get two different firms. That is not a bug. That is the whole new model.

So What Do You Actually Do

The work we do at the agency is watch how ChatGPT reasons, see why it surfaced one firm over another, then reverse-engineer that and build it into the client's website content. Every query with "best," "top," or "near me" gets broken down into parameters the AI searches against. We work backward from those parameters.

There is more to it than one paragraph, but the point for your in-house question is this: the skill you would be supervising is not the skill that will matter in a few months. It takes years to understand how these models actually pick, and it changes constantly.

The Honest Answer to "Should I Bring It In-House"

If the person you hire has spent years making mistakes across a lot of firms and learning from them, maybe. But if you are hiring one generalist to run old-style SEO under your supervision, you will be paying someone to maintain a system that is being retired.

I am not saying this to sell you an agency. I am saying the thing you are trying to take control of is disappearing, and the thing replacing it is a different discipline entirely. Get clear on which one you are actually buying before you build a seat around it.

Common Questions